Debbi wrote:Did you have a midwife or OB for your prenatal care and delivery of your baby, and what are the pros and cons?
How does one go about getting a midwife? I've heard that you need to plan really well in advance (even before pregnancy!) as they are really busy.
Debbi,
I was with midwives for my entire pregnancy, delivery and post-partum care (first 6 weeks). I think that yes midwives are a good choice IF ALL GOES WELL WITH YOUR PREGNANCY AND CHILD, i.e. if there are no complications... (of course one can never know such things in advance, so it's like rolling a die..) However, as we unfortunately found out, they simply did not have the medical expertise to deal with our baby's problems that started 2-3 weeks after he was born (acid reflux kicked in and he had screaming fits all the time, wouldn't sleep, etc), and frankly dismissed us as 'anxious new parents', only looking to the fact that he was gaining weight fine and giving us the typical 'babies will cry' dismissing response to our concerns... it finally took us finding a good DOCTOR who knew her stuff to put our son on medication, to give him relief from his suffering, only at 2.5 months of age... (we went through HELL trying to help him ourselves, without adequate medical advise). While the idea of midwives is a good one (as a 'more caring', patient, etc option), but from my experience, it is only a safe option if you think you'll have a routine pregnancy, delivery and baby-condition... the only 'routine' portion I had was the pregnancy. The delivery was also complicated (and my husband still blames the midwive's decision to keep me pushing extra-long for some of the baby's problems later on - especially his fairly serious jaundace condition, due to swallowing muconium poop that broke inside the placenta after prolonged stress of delivery... ) but for sure I shouldn't have been labouring for so long, and should've had the c-section earlier, as my baby was both wedged in at a bad angle and had a large head that was never going to pass through anyway...) I am very glad that we decided to do it in the hospital, as it's quite possible the baby might've not survived such a traumatic labour at home. (In fact we are very grateful that my delivery had to be officially taken over by a doctor, as the midwife wanted me to go through a barbaric 'tug-of-war' technique to try and push out the baby by brute force, which would've no doubt killed him, given his condition... the doctor said a definite 'no' to this, thank goodness... (even the eventual c-section was also complicated, with him still being wedged in my pelvis, and he came out without vital signs; thank god they were able to resuscitate him...) Post-partum care was again very remedial, with only nurse-level knowledge that they had, which left our son suffering unnecessarily for weeks afterwards...
It really scarred us for a very long time after, not just the delivery experience itself but also the fact that our son was left to suffer for so long because they neither had the care or initiative to properly investigate our concerns about his condition later nor the medical knowledge to know what might be wrong with him... if we ever gather up the courage to go through a second child again, we would definitely NOT go with midwives. Minor benefits like slightly-shorter waiting time for appointments (we still had to wait at each appointment) and a friendlier 'chat' while you're there (although my family doctor - who is now the baby's doctor - is a wonderful woman and equally patient and friendly; I wish she could've been my OB as well) do not outweigh serious issues like medical expertise and willingness to investigate possible problems.
Good luck with your baby!
P.S. sorry for the long response.. it is almost 'therapy' for me to share this with other moms who might be considering the midwives option, as I feel that all is not 'peaches and cream' with midwives...